original premises I have read. Aliens land at several locations on Earth. They
have no interest whatsoever in humanity and use alien barriers to ensure they
are not bothered by humans. The aliens only stay for a short time and after
they depart, they leave alien trash scattered around the locations, as if they
were a bunch of bogans on a camping trip.
Some of the trash has amazing properties, like batteries
that never run down. But much of the trash is dangerous, and many who venture
into the areas are killed. So the authorities fence the areas off, making them
no go areas except for those desperate for the money that retrieving an alien
artefact brings. These people are called stalkers.
The novel takes place in an unnamed country, but most
probably the US, at an undated time. Its main character, Redrick Schuhart, is a
stalker, who at first retrieves items from the prohibited areas for a local
university to study. I found him a difficult man to empathise with as he had no
qualms about the potential consequences of what he was doing, even though he did
it because he needed to support his wife and genetically deformed daughter. He
needed the money, and everyone else including fellow stalkers, but except for
his family, didn’t matter.
The book was originally written in Russian and then
translated into English. It has a strange atmosphere to it, like they are
living in a bleak totalitarian regime that is waiting to pounce on them, with little
hope for the future. It actually reminded me of the atmosphere of 1984.
The alien artefacts don’t seem to offer a great future
for humanity either. In the hands of more right-wing writers, the trash would
have either been a great boon or great threat to humanity. But in this novel it
is like the trash is neutral, leave it alone and no harm will come, but some
people just need the money.
There is little joy in the lives of the characters. One
of the authors admits in the afterword that they were trying to make
capitalists appear unhappy, but the unhappiness of the characters, to me, was
more a reflection of the downtrodden Russian society at the time the book was
written in 1971.
The prose itself is bleak and unpoetic. I found the
climax clouded as hope lead to deadly delusions of a better world.
But if you are after a novel that is different in both
premise and style, Roadside Picnic is worth a read. I have seen it on a list of
the 50 best modern science fiction novels.
0 Responses
Good review Graham.
Your commitment to literature and science fiction is inspired.
Sounds like an interesting read.
being a movie buff I recommend two strange but worthwhile sci-fi russian films from the legendary director Andrei Tarkovsky, Solaris and Stalker, but not for the faint-hearted.
Hey Anthony, Stalker is loosely based on Roadside Picnic. So yes I want to see it. Maybe there is a free Russian movie app on itunes.